Platform Overview
To provide users with greater flexibility, we support two submission & peer review platforms: ARES and IUASP. These platforms have different operating rules. Please review the following information carefully to select the option that best meets your requirements.
Common Features of Both Platforms
Rapid Publication Process
Accelerated workflow for faster publication
Track Manuscript Workflow
Real-time tracking of manuscript status
Seamless Communication
Integrated messaging between authors, editors, and reviewers
Self-Defined Review Schedule
Flexible time management and status control
Review Reward
Reviewer recognition and incentive mechanisms
Distinctive Advantages of Both Platforms
APC waiver and discount
Recommend reviewers for one's own manuscript
Point-based reward for reviewer (1 point = $ 1)
Multiple ways to earn points
Independent submission and review interfaces
Seamless cross-journal transfer
One-click misconduct reporting
Transparent review with open dialogue
Cash reward for reviewer ($ 200 per review)
Global reach for your scholarly influence
Integrated submission and review system
Annual honors and special awards
Our Commitment
We are committed to maintaining consistent editorial standards. Regardless of the submission platform you choose, all manuscripts are subjected to the same rigorous peer review criteria, manuscript processing procedures, quality control measures, and publication ethics.
There is no variation in the fairness of review, efficiency of processing, or quality of publication between the two platforms, ensuring impartial treatment for every author.
Need more information?
If you're unsure which system to choose, please visit ARES and IUASP for detailed information. You can also contact the journal editorial office.