Main techniques to assess receptor heteromerization
Method | Proximity/resolution | Sample type |
---|---|---|
Co-IP | N.A./sampled tissue | Lysed tissue |
In situ hybridization | > 500 nm–1 µm | Heterologous system/native tissue |
Immunogold | 20–30 nm | Native tissue |
PLA | 16 nm (strand level)–40 nm (epitope level) | Native tissue/heterologous system |
BRET | < 10 nm | Heterologous system |
FRET | < 10 nm | Heterologous system |
TR-FRET | < 10 nm | Heterologous system/native tissue/membrane preparations |
SRET | < 10 nm | Heterologous system |
AlphaLisa | < 200 nm | Membrane preparations |
NanoBiT | N.D./low molecular weight of NanoLuc (19 kDa) | Heterologous system |
SPT | 100–300 nmMovement detection < 25 nm | Heterologous system/culture of neurons |
N.A.: not applicable; N.D.: not determined; Co-IP: co-immunoprecipitation; PLA: proximity ligation assay; BRET: bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; FRET: fluorescence/Förster resonance energy transfer; TR-FRET: time-resolved FRET; SRET: sequential resonance energy transfer; SPT: single particle tracking