Trend of PROM gain in degrees following IMES TX
Muscle treated | PROM gain in degrees following IMES TX | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hamstring PROM gains: measured each LE in supine | Sequential order of sessions | Right hamstring degrees gained | Left hamstring degrees gained |
Session 1 | 4.5° | 7° | |
Session 2 | 4.6° | 11.3° | |
Session 3 | 1.4° | 2.4° | |
Session 4 | 8.8° | -- | |
Session 5 | 6.7° | 10.8° | |
Session 6 | 10.8° | 3.2° | |
Session 7 | 1.2° | 7.1° | |
Session 8 | 9.7° | 11.3° | |
Session 9 | 9.6° | -- | |
Session 10 | 5.4° | 8.9° | |
Session 11 | 2.8° | 1.8° | |
Session 12 | -- | 13 | |
Session 13 | 9.4° | 2.2° | |
Session 14 | 4.7° | 4.1° | |
Number of TXs: | 13 TXs | 12 TXs | |
Hip adductor PROM gains: measured right and left LE range with a combined stretch, in hook lying | Sequential order of sessions | Combined adductor degrees gained | |
Session 1 | 17.9° | ||
Session 2 | 5.7° | ||
Session 3 | 3° | ||
Session 4 | 3° | ||
Session 5 | 8° | ||
Session 6 | 4.7° | ||
Session 7 | 9° | ||
Session 8 | 12.2° | ||
Session 9 | 24.1° | ||
Session 10 | 13° | ||
Session 11 | 26° | ||
Session 12 | 23.4° | ||
Session 13 | 5° | ||
Number of TXs: | 13 TXs | ||
Gastrocnemius PROM gains: measured each LE in supine | Sequential order of sessions | Right gastrocnemius degrees gained | Left gastrocnemius degrees gained |
Session 1 | 24° | 10.6° | |
Session 2 | 9.5° | 10° | |
Session 3 | 12.9° | .7° | |
Session 4 | 1.9° | -- | |
Session 5 | 2° | 9.7° | |
Session 6 | 11.7° | 4.5° | |
Session 7 | 6.8° | 15.2° | |
Session 8 | -- | 7.5° | |
Session 9 | 3.6° | 20.6° | |
Session 10 | 15.8° | 2° | |
Session 11 | 4.9° | 5° | |
Session 12 | 10.1° | 21.4° | |
Session 13 | -- | 4.5° | |
Session 14 | -- | 1.9° | |
Session 15 | -- | 17.4° | |
Session 16 | 5° | 11.3° | |
Session 17 | 6.5° | 2.4° | |
Session 18 | 12.3° | 10.1° | |
Session 19 | 25.5° | 2.8° | |
Session 20 | -- | 6.7° | |
Session 21 | 16.8° | -- | |
Session 22 | 7.1° | 1.2° | |
Session 23 | 17° | 3° | |
Number of TXs: | 18 TXs | 21 TXs |
The list of DN sessions is sequential though TXs were not performed in specific intervals, rather IMES was utilized to address patient or parent complaints of tightness