Levator advancement | | Small-incision techniques exist Possibility of performing simultaneous blepharoplasty Reoperation is easy to perform Minimal changes in eyelid anatomy
| Does not correct dermatochalasis or lash ptosis Recurrence rate between 9–12% Entropion of the upper lid Possibility of over- or under correction of the ptosis Risk of asymmetry in upper eyelid height
| [30, 40, 41, 56–61] |
Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) | | Less risk of injury to sensory nerves and the distal branch of the facial nerve No visible scar Short operating time and learning curve Avoidance of dry eyes and floppy eyelid
| Need for an additional incision for blepharoplasty Not indicated for poor levator function May increase symptoms in patients with dry-eye syndrome Avoided in patients with corneal disease or filtering blebs
| [42, 61–63] |
Frontalis flap | | No need for alloplastic or autologous tissue Improves the direction of the pull Minimal ptosis on upward gaze compared to frontalis sling Can be done at a younger age Low risk of facial nerve injury
| Possibility of severe lagophthalmos, lid lag, and nocturnal exposure keratopathy Eyebrow asymmetry Overcorrection not reversible Not indicated in patients with poor levator function
| [64–66] |
Frontalis sling | Linkage of the frontalis muscle to the eyelid tarsus using a sling material Material of choice: autogenous fascia Other materials used: banked fascia, nylon monofilament, polyester, PTFE, polypropylene, ETHIBOND, and silicone
| | | [44–51, 67] |