Pulmonary congestion is a key determinant of heart failure, but for a long time it has been an elusive target for the clinical cardiologist in the pre-B-line era, despite research efforts of Carlo Giuntini, a pneumologist who attempted the quantification of lung water in the seventies with too insensitive chest X-ray lung water score, too cumbersome nuclear medicine, and too complex invasive thermodilution techniques. Daniel Lichtenstein, is a French intensivist who first discovered lung ultrasound as a sign of extravascular lung water in 1997. B-lines (also known as ultrasound lung comets) detectable by lung ultrasound arise from the pleural line, extend towards the edge of the screen, and move synchronously with respiration. In cardiology, B-lines were introduced in 2004 and are now the dominant technique for research applications and clinical purposes. B-lines showed a prognostic value in several clinical scenarios, largely independent and additive over echocardiographic predictors such as ejection fraction. The methodology became user-friendly in the last years, with a reduction of the scanning sites from the original 28 to a simplified 4-site scan now extracting information on lung water in < 1 minute. More recently, B-lines were also studied during physical and pharmacological stress. Signs of pulmonary congestion are found during stress in 1 out of 3 all-comers with normal findings at rest. Artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound and clinical data allows for the detection of B lines, their quantification, and the assessment of their nature. The B-lines phenotype can cluster around different endotypes: dry (in systemic sclerosis and lung interstitial fibrosis); wet (water); sterile (as in cardiogenic edema); infective (as in COVID-19 and interstitial pneumonia); right heart-sided (as in pulmonary arterial hypertension); left-heart sided (as in heart failure or valvular heart disease). Artificial intelligence B-lines and pocket-size insonation of the B-lines-driven decongestion therapy are now on the horizon.

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue, frequently resulting in myocardial infarction and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Prompt and precise diagnosis is essential to avert complications such as heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Although invasive coronary angiography remains the gold standard for high-risk patients, noninvasive multimodality imaging is becoming more prevalent for those at low-to-intermediate risk. This review evaluated the current state of multimodality imaging in IHD, including echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) angiography, and invasive coronary angiography. Each modality has distinct strengths and limitations, and their complementary use provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac health. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into imaging workflows holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. AI algorithms can optimize image acquisition, processing, and interpretation of complex imaging data. Emerging technologies like 4D flow MRI, molecular imaging, and hybrid systems [e.g., positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI, PET/CT] integrate anatomical, functional, and molecular data, providing comprehensive insights into cardiac pathology and potentially revolutionizing the management of IHD. This review also explored the clinical applications and impact of multimodality imaging on patient outcomes, emphasizing its role in improving diagnostic precision and guiding therapeutic decisions. Future directions include AI-driven decision support systems and personalized medicine approaches. Addressing regulatory and ethical challenges, such as data privacy and algorithm transparency, is crucial for the broader adoption of these advanced technologies. This review highlighted the transformative potential of AI-enhanced multimodality imaging in improving the diagnosis and management of IHD.

Pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) not only present immediate risks to maternal and fetal health but also have long-term implications for the cardiovascular health of offspring. Emerging evidence suggests that these complications may induce epigenetic changes, which in turn predispose offspring to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) later in life. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA regulation, play crucial roles in fetal development by influencing gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns have been observed in offspring exposed to adverse intrauterine environments, affecting genes that regulate blood pressure, lipid metabolism, and inflammation, key factors in CVDs development. Similarly, histone modifications linked to pregnancy complications can disrupt the expression of genes involved in vascular function, contributing to increased cardiovascular risk. Additionally, dysregulation of microRNAs in response to complications like gestational diabetes may influence pathways related to insulin signaling and atherosclerosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the epigenetic mechanisms by which pregnancy complications increase CVDs risk in offspring, highlighting potential avenues for early intervention and therapeutic strategies. Understanding these mechanisms could lead to the development of targeted interventions during pregnancy, potentially reducing the intergenerational transmission of cardiovascular risk and improving long-term health outcomes for both mothers and their children.

Exposure to ionizing radiation has recognized detrimental cancer and non-cancer health effects. These effects are now well-proven not only for high doses > 1,000 millisieverts (mSv) associated with head radiotherapy but also for moderate (100–1,000 mSv) and even low (< 100 mSv) doses, of interest for professionally exposed cardiologists. The head of interventional cardiologists is highly exposed to ionizing radiation, with possible damage to the eye and brain. Unprotected interventional cardiologists experience head radiation doses up to ten times greater than chest doses below lead aprons, with marked exposure to the left hemisphere of the brain reaching up to 2 Sv—equivalent to 10,000 chest X-rays over a professional lifetime. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the background of radioprotection, the biological mechanisms involved, and the epidemiological evidence regarding the health effects of head exposure to ionizing radiation in invasive cardiologists. These health effects include cataracts, brain cancer, cerebrovascular diseases, neurodegeneration, and mood disorders. The evidence gathered from other exposed populations, which experienced similar eye and brain doses, has also been reviewed. This is important because the doses, risks, and effects are consistent in cases of repeated exposures, which occur more frequently for patients, and in situations involving chronic low doses, as seen with interventional cardiologists. Despite these risks, effective protective measures—such as suspended lead ceilings, curtains, and specialized eyewear—can reduce radiation exposure to near-zero levels. In some fields, like interventional cardiac electrophysiology, a groundbreaking near-zero radiation approach using non-fluoroscopic methods has been created, eliminating radiation exposure and alleviating orthopedic stress and operational discomfort. The race to zero radiation in interventional cardiology is ongoing.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common type of entrapment neuropathy and affects approximately 1% to 5% of the general population, mostly patients older than 50 years. CTS is present in various conditions and diseases and could also be an early sign of systemic transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), associated with amyloid cardiomyopathy and subsequent heart failure. With advances in the treatment of cardiac amyloidosis, patient prognosis could be significantly improved with an early diagnosis. Amyloidosis represents a group of disorders characterized by the extracellular deposition of destabilized protein fragments, aggregating as amyloid fibrils, thereby leading to organ dysfunction. Among these, ATTR is a significant subgroup. This study protocol aims to explore the potential association between CTS and systemic and cardiac ATTR. The study design involves a case-control approach, with assessments including physical examination, laboratory tests, electromyography, electrocardiogram, wrist ultrasound, and scintigraphy with ^99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (^99mTc-DPD). Histopathological analysis and genetic testing will be performed when appropriate. Statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate the relationship between CTS and ATTR. The study seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of identifying ATTR in patients with idiopathic CTS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05409833).

Chagas disease is a systemic illness characterized by acute and chronic phases. If untreated, it can lead to dysfunction of vital organs, notably the heart, ultimately resulting in heart failure. Transmission primarily occurs through the feces of triatomine insects carrying the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, either via a bite wound or intact mucous membranes. Diagnosis of Chagas disease involves serological tests, electrocardiographic findings, and imaging studies. A 58-year-old male patient from Peru with chronic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent evaluation at a tertiary care hospital. Given the uncertain etiology, a comprehensive diagnostic approach was adopted, emphasizing the pivotal role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography in managing chronic cardiomyopathy of Chagas disease. Leveraging these imaging modalities together could augment our ability to evaluate myocardial inflammation and tailor therapeutic strategies accordingly.

Redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has long been the standard treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and insufficiency, but transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly for symptomatic AS. With calcification being a primary mechanism behind structural valve degeneration, factors such as patient characteristics and the type of bioprosthetic valve play crucial roles in determining risk. Valve-in-valve TAVR (ViV TAVR) has gained prominence as a viable alternative to redo SAVR in recent years. Echocardiography plays a pivotal role in patient selection, procedural guidance, and post-procedural evaluation in ViV TAVR. From pre-procedural assessment using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to intra-procedural guidance and post-procedural follow-up, echocardiography aids in ensuring procedural success and monitoring valve function. Decision-making between redo SAVR and ViV TAVR involves multidisciplinary teams considering various factors like patient risk profile, anatomical considerations, and technical feasibility. While redo SAVR remains preferred for younger patients with lower risk, ViV TAVR is increasingly considered for older patients or those with higher reoperation risks. Factors such as coronary artery obstruction risk, patient-prosthesis mismatch, and paravalvular leak guide treatment decisions. Procedural techniques in ViV TAVR have evolved to minimize complications and optimize outcomes. Factors like access route selection, valve choice, and procedural guidance techniques significantly impact procedural success. Balloon valve fracture and preventive strategies against coronary obstruction are crucial considerations during the procedure. Post-procedural evaluation involves assessing clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, with long-term studies indicating favorable results but highlighting the importance of careful evaluation of transprosthetic gradients and valve function. ViV TAVR offers promising outcomes but requires meticulous patient selection, procedural planning, and post-procedural management to ensure optimal results.

Pneumopericardium, the presence of air within the pericardial sac, is a rare but critical condition that can lead to severe complications such as tension pneumopericardium and cardiac tamponade, causing hemodynamic instability and necessitating immediate intervention. Various etiologies include congenital defects, post-surgical complications, infections, and trauma. Malignancies, such as advanced esophageal cancer or lung carcinoma, can also cause pneumopericardium via fistula formation. Multimodal imaging, including chest X-ray, echocardiography, and computed tomography (CT), is essential for diagnosis. This case report discusses a 65-year-old male with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who developed pneumopericardium following the removal of a left lobe liver drainage catheter. Initial CT imaging revealed liver lesions suspicious for metastatic disease or abscess, leading to drainage procedures. Following the removal of the drainage tube, the patient experienced respiratory distress and hypotension, and computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) revealed pneumopericardium, likely due to a fistula formed between the abscess and pericardium. Despite no echocardiographic signs of tamponade, the patient’s persistent hypotension warranted CT-guided pericardiocentesis, resulting in gradual blood pressure improvement. This case highlights the intricate interplay between malignancy, infection, and procedural complications in developing pneumopericardium. It emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach and the importance of considering both the quantity and rate of air accumulation when assessing the risk of hemodynamic compromise. The patient’s hemodynamic instability and subsequent improvement following pericardiocentesis underscore the critical role of timely intervention in managing this condition.