The global prevalence of intracranial aneurysms (IA) ranges from 5–10%, with a demographic variation. Large and giant aneurysms typically involve cavernous and paraclinoid segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA), and represent 5% of IA. Typically, these lesions involve segments of the ICA, especially the cavernous and paraclinoid segments. The remaining cases affect the vertebrobasilar region, middle cerebral artery (MCA), and anterior cerebral artery (ACA). From the morphological point of view, they are divided into saccular and fusiform. In cases of rupture, the subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is the most common presentation followed by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or both. Other manifestations can occur as occlusion of perforating vessels, embolic events, seizures, and mass effects. The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is controversial, and the aim of treatment is to exclude the lesions and preserve neurological function. Endovascular techniques for the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms, in particular, ICA reconstruction using flow-diverting stents, have become a valid option. However, surgery or endovascular treatment has a number of limitations and the choice of treatment is individual in each case. This type of lesion has an extremely poor natural history, and treatment is a challenge regardless of the technique used.

The report described a clinical case of a 55-year-old female, with a personal history of hypertension, hyperthyroidism, and depressive syndrome. The patient started complaints of moderate-intensity right frontal headache, progressively worsening with two months of evolution. She also reported blurred vision and diplopia. Brain computed tomography (CT) documented a partially calcified sellar and parasellar lesion. Subsequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/MRI angiographies were performed and showed a saccular aneurysm of the right ICA, cavernous segment. The patient underwent a diagnostic and therapeutic angiography with stent placement. Clinical and imaging improvements were documented by angiography and MRI angiography with progressive reduction of the aneurysm during the period of follow-up.

Delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage is one of the most important causes of mortality and poor functional outcome in patients. Initially, the etiology and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia focused primarily on cerebral vasospasm. However, recent studies have detected that depolarization, microcirculation, and autoregulation disorder, which spreads together with cerebral vasospasm, also play a role in the etiology. The main treatment strategies in the prevention and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia are the regulation of blood pressure and the use of calcium channel blockers, especially nimodipine. The main step in the early diagnosis and treatment of the disease is to monitor the neurological clinical status. In addition to transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging angiography, continuous electroencephalography and invasive brain multimodal examination may be required in the follow-up period of the disease. In addition to blood pressure regulation, optimization of cardiac output, endovascular interventions, angioplasty, and/or intra-arterial vasodilator infusion are other treatment methods. This review aimed to evaluate delayed cerebral ischemia, one of the most important complications of subarachnoid hemorrhage, in the light of current literature.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a class of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) characterized by deficits in three domains: impairments in social interactions, language, and communication, and increased stereotyped restrictive/repetitive behaviors and interests. The exact etiology of ASD remains unknown. Genetics, gestational exposure to inflammation, and environmental stressors, which combine to affect mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolism, are implicated yet poorly understood contributors and incompletely delineated pathways toward the relative risk of ASD. Many studies have shown a clear male bias in the incidence of ASD and other NDD. In other words, being male is a significant yet poorly understood risk factor for the development of NDD. This review discusses the link between these factors by looking at the current body of evidence. Understanding the link between the multiplicity of hits—from genes to environmental stressors and possible sexual determinants, contributing to autism susceptibility is critical to developing targeted interventions to mitigate these risks.