Summary of imaging techniques for evaluation of liver stiffness in patients with NAFLD
NMR-based techniques | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
End-point | AUROC | Cutoff (kPa) | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | Study population, reference | |
2D MRE | |||||
AF | 0.93–0.96 | 3.6–4.8 | Se 85-Sp 85; PPV 71-NPV 93 | 628 NAFLD, [77, 113] | |
Cirrhosis | 0.9 | > 4.1 | Se 86-Sp 93; PPV 53-NPV 98 | 384 NAFLD, [77] | |
3D MRE | |||||
– 40Hz | AF | 0.98 | 2.43 | Se 100-Sp 94; PPV 72-NPV 100 | 100 NAFLD, [114] |
– 60Hz | 0.92 | 3.4 | |||
– 40Hz | Cirrhosis | 0.99 | 3.2 | Se 86-Sp 96; PPV 81-NPV 97 | |
– 60Hz | 0.98 | 4 |
US-based techniques | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
End-point | AUROC | Cutoff (kPa) | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | Study population, reference | |
TE (Fibroscan®) | |||||
- M Probe | AF | 0.87 | 7.6–8 | Se 89-Sp 77; PPV 43-NPV 95 | 1, 540 NAFLD, [77] |
- XL Probe | 0.86 | 5.7–9.3 | Se 75-Sp 74; PPV 43-NPV 95 | 579 NAFLD, [77] | |
- M Probe | Cirrhosis | 0.92 | 10.3–11.3 | Se 87-Sp 86; PPV 46-NPV 98 | 1, 362 NAFLD, [77] |
- XL Probe | 0.94 | 7.2–16 | Se 84-Sp 80; PPV 39-NPV 98 | 654 NAFLD, [77] | |
ARFI | |||||
SF | 0.89 | Se 80-Sp 85 | 723 NAFLD, [136] | ||
2D-SWE | |||||
SF | 0.85 | 9.2 | 156 NAFLD, [138] | ||
AF | 0.89 | > 8.3 < 10.7 | Se 71-Sp 90 | 291 NAFLD, [139] | |
Cirrhosis | 0.91 | 13.5 | 156 NAFLD, [138] | ||
0.88 | > 10.5 | Se 90-Sp 72 | 291 NAFLD, [139] |
AF (F3); Cirrhosis (F4); significant fibrosis: 4 > F ≥ 2