Comparison of LVEF as measured by different non-invasive imaging methods, reported mean difference and agreement
| Echo 3D vs. CMR | SPECT vs. CMR | MDCT vs. CMR | Echo3D vs. SPECT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mannaerts et al. 2003 [6] | MD 1.8% ± 11.6% | |||
| Persson et al. 2005 [7] | MD 4% ± 7% (P < 0.001) | |||
| Belge et al. 2006 [8] | MD 1% ± 21% (P = NS) r = 0.95; P < 0.001 | |||
| Soliman et al. 2008 [9] | MD 0.2% ± 6.2% | |||
| Beitner et al. 2019 [10] | MD 0.56% ± 15% | MD 0.75% ± 10% | 1.3% ± 20% | |
| ICC 0.71 | ICC 0.89 | ICC 0.51 | ||
| β = 0.72, P = 0.003 | β = 0.90, P < 0.001 |
Echo2D: bidimensional echocardiography; Echo3D: three dimensional echocardiography; MDCT: gated multidetector row computed tomography; MD: mean difference; NS: not significant; r: correlation index; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient