Advantages and disadvantages of in vitro methods for preclinical drug screening for CRC
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | Key types | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2D cell culture system | Simple and low consumption for maintenance; rapid screening; high reproducibility | Require considerable large panel; marked discrepancy with in vivo and clinical studies; lacks in vivo characteristics | NCI60 panel | [51, 52] |
Bodmer group (> 120 CRC cell lines) | [53] | |||
Co-culture of CRC cell lines with CAFs | [54, 55] | |||
Microfluidic based-cell culture system | Low reagent consumption; allow high throughput screening; stable biochemical/concentration gradient; shear stress generation; microvasculature | Lack of representative functional vascular network and heterogeneous phenotype of tumor; present transient effects of cell-drug behavior; not able to withstand long-term experiment; difficult to determine individual cell effect | Microfluidic CRC culture | [56–59] |
Microfluidic co-culture of CRC with fibroblasts | [60, 61] | |||
3D spheroid |
|
| Scaffold-free spheroid | [23] |
Co-culture CRC spheroids with fibroblasts | [60, 62–64] | |||
MCTS | [65] | |||
3D organoids |
|
| Organoids in Matrigel | [66] |
Organoids in chemically defined synthetic hydrogels | [67] | |||
CTCDO | [68] | |||
PDO | [69–72] | |||
Serrated CRC organoids | [73–77] |
NCI: National Cancer Institute; CTCDO: circulating tumor cells (CTCs)-derived organoids; MCTS: multicellular tumor spheroids; PDO: patient-derived organoid