Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a recommended surgical strategy at present, the core content is to reduce perioperative stress response and postoperative complications through perioperative multi-mode analgesia and intensive surgery. Electroacupuncture (EA) has been widely used in various clinical applications, and its efficacy and safety have been fully proven. The application of acupuncture in ERAS will have an important impact on rehabilitation research and development. In this review, the molecular mechanism of EA in ERAS are summed up from promoting perioperative efficacy to improving postoperative immune status. The combination of EA and ERAS may better promote the recovery of patients and the development of rehabilitation.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is one of the leading causes of death that affect many patients around the world. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted our healthcare system in large that diagnosis and management of GI cancer have suffered with a reduction in cancer screening. This review will describe the current practices of cancer screening during COVID-19 pandemic and summarize how each GI cancer (esophageal, gastric, colorectal, and hepatocellular cancers) has been affected by COVID-19. World widely there has been a decreasing trend in screening, diagnosis, and management of GI cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many healthcare institutions are now observing the effect of this change and implementing practice variations to adapt to the pandemic.

In the context of in-hospital care management, the need for infusion therapies involves the choice of appropriate devices. Historically, there is no consensus about the preference for vascular accesses, although the data present in the literature would seem to favor peripheral ones due to fearful complications and a non-negligible rate of bloodstream infections. It is also true the decision for central routes is sometimes dictated by the patient’s general clinical conditions (especially as a result of surgery) or by the need to establish continuous short or long-term support therapies. Therefore, it would seem anachronistic to favor one strategy rather than another. Probably data should be reviewed, considering and evaluating the correct application of indications and guidelines for both positioning and management of venous accesses, without facing methodological biases that could lead to scarcy and inconclusive results; although it is undeniable that some conditions promote the onset of complications.