From:  Exploring the effect of Pinus halepensis resin quality on the vinification of Retsina by untargeted profile analysis

Significance (※) of components when sample grouping is based on resins’ tapping method

CompoundVIP (PLS-DA)P-value (t-test)Log2 fold change
1,4-Cineole1.99276.62E-062.4897
Terpinen-4-ol1.72652.21E-041.3314
Estragole1.48202.95E-03–0.7253
p-Cymene1.30848.75E-030.3231
2-Nonanol1.15570.0296–0.3828
α-Copaene1.06040.03600.4718
γ-Terpinene0.87900.11250.4138
Limonene0.86730.13240.2572
Fenchol0.69710.3877–0.1622
α-Pinene0.68930.3046–0.4170
β-Myrcene0.68130.78980.0548
Myrtenol0.65610.7157–0.0667
α-Terpinolene0.63980.4267–0.2152
α-Terpineol0.62380.4139–0.1925
β-Caryophyllene0.61980.64550.1027
Linalool0.58890.3217–0.2596
2-Nonanone0.57260.4197–0.1006
Endo-borneol0.55750.38450.1247
Camphene0.36210.9233–0.0230

※: significant values with VIP > 1.0 for multivariate analysis and P < 0.05 for univariate analysis are denoted in bold; †: a negative Log2 fold change indicates a direction towards resins of natural tapping