Cervical cancer remains a significant global health challenge, ranking as the fourth most common cancer among women. Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary etiological factor, leading to immune evasion mechanisms that promote tumor development and progression. Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative approach in the management of cervical cancer, aiming to restore and enhance the body’s immune response against tumor cells. Checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have shown promising results in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has been approved for PD-L1-positive cervical cancer, demonstrating durable responses. However, low response rates necessitate exploration of combination strategies. Trials are underway combining checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, radiation, or other immunotherapeutic agents to enhance efficacy. Therapeutic vaccines targeting HPV antigens, such as E6 and E7 oncoproteins, are also a focus of active research. These vaccines aim to elicit robust cytotoxic T-cell responses, offering a potential strategy for early intervention and disease control. Adoptive T-cell therapies, including engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, represent cutting-edge advancements, though challenges with tumor heterogeneity and off-target effects persist. However, challenges such as limited response rates and immune evasion mechanisms remain. The tumor microenvironment (TME) in cervical cancer, characterized by immunosuppressive cells and cytokines, poses a significant barrier to effective immunotherapy. Emerging approaches targeting the TME, such as cytokine modulation, hold promise in overcoming resistance mechanisms. Key gaps include a lack of biomarkers for patient selection, insufficient understanding of TME dynamics, and suboptimal strategies for overcoming antigen heterogeneity and immune resistance. This review addresses these issues by providing a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of cervical cancer immunotherapy, identifying critical barriers, and highlighting emerging approaches, such as combination therapies, novel immune targets, and strategies to modulate the TME, to guide future research and clinical practice.

Glioblastoma, an aggressive and lethal brain tumor, presents enormous clinical challenges, including molecular heterogeneity, high recurrence rates, resistance to conventional therapies, and limited therapeutic penetration across the blood-brain barrier. The glioblastoma microenvironment, characterized by a dynamic interplay of cellular and non-cellular components, is a key driver of tumor growth and therapeutic resistance. Neuroinflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, play pivotal roles in this microenvironment, contributing to tumor progression and immune evasion. This review highlights oncolytic virotherapy as a promising therapeutic avenue, focusing on its potential to modulate neuroinflammatory responses, induce localized immune reactions, and deliver immunomodulatory factors directly to the tumor site. While encouraging outcomes have been observed, challenges such as overcoming the blood-brain barrier, managing host antiviral immunity, and mitigating potential risks to normal neuronal cells remain critical barriers to clinical translation. By analyzing the intricate interactions of oncolytic viruses with the glioblastoma microenvironment and synthesizing findings from preclinical and clinical trials, this review provides actionable insights into developing personalized and effective therapeutic strategies for this aggressive tumor based on oncolytic virotherapy alone or when using it combined with conventional therapies, immunotherapy, natural killer-cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy, and dendritic cell therapy.

Laryngeal cancer, a subtype of head and neck cancer, poses significant challenges due to its profound impact on essential functions such as speech and swallowing and poor survival rates in advanced stages. Traditional treatments—surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy—are often associated with high morbidity and substantial recurrence rates, emphasizing the urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized oncology by countering tumor-induced immune evasion, restoring immune surveillance, and activating T-cell responses against cancer. This review examines the role of ICIs in laryngeal cancer management, with a focus on pembrolizumab and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 agents), which are clinically established, as well as investigational therapies such as dostarlimab (anti-PD-1), atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1), and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4). Pembrolizumab, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and 5-fluorouracil, is approved as a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), based on evidence from the Keynote-048 trial. This pivotal trial demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefits over the cetuximab-based standard regimen. Similarly, nivolumab showed improved OS in the CheckMate-141 trial, supporting its approval as a second-line therapy for patients with platinum-refractory disease. ICIs have shown durable survival benefits and a more manageable toxicity profile compared to traditional chemotherapy. Immune-related adverse events are generally mild and controllable; however, in some cases, they can become severe and even life-threatening. Furthermore, ICIs are being investigated in combination with radiotherapy, as well as in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, where preliminary findings suggest these approaches may enhance efficacy, preserve organ function, and overcome resistance to conventional treatments. The integration of ICIs into multimodal treatment strategies holds promise for transforming the therapeutic landscape of advanced laryngeal cancer. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights ongoing research, and explores strategies to enhance survival and quality of life for patients facing this challenging malignancy.

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) and highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HS-TKIs) positively impact the progression-free survival (PFS) of locally advanced and metastatic thyroid cancer cases. Moreover, disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) improvements were observed in some instances, suggesting a general benefit in disease control. In advanced and metastatic thyroid cancers, other conventional treatments are often ineffective when surgery cannot be performed due to the extension of the disease and/or the invasion of vital neck structures (such as the larynx, trachea, esophagus, recurrent laryngeal nerve, and carotid artery). In these cases, systemic treatments with MKIs and HS-TKIs have recently been evaluated for their potential to block tumor growth and reduce tumor size to make surgery possible or improve the control of metastatic disease. The study aimed to evaluate the performance of these systemic drugs in the neoadjuvant treatment of thyroid cancer patients, focusing on their efficacy according to the different histology.

Bladder cancer is currently the most common malignant tumor of the urinary system. The traditional treatment methods for bladder cancer are mainly surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy; however, these treatment methods do not improve the clinical prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new treatment methods to improve the survival rate and quality-of-life of patients with bladder cancer. Over recent years, the rapid development of tumor immunotherapy has become a significant alternative to traditional treatment, and provides new hope to patients. This review aims to introduce neoantigens and their possible role in the treatment of bladder cancer, and to explore the current limitations of neoantigens for the treatment of bladder cancer.

The discovery of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes led to a better understanding of tumorigenesis, and prompted the development of molecularly targeted therapy. Over the past 30 years, many new drugs, which are primarily aimed at activated oncogenic proteins in signal transduction pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival, have been introduced in the clinic. Despite its rational design, the overall efficacy of targeted therapy has been modest. Recently, the noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of important cellular processes in addition to the known regulatory proteins. It now appears that dual epigenetic regulatory systems exist in higher eukaryotic cells: a ncRNA network that governs essential cell functions, like cell fate decision and maintenance of homeostasis, and a protein-based system that presides over core physiological processes, like cell division and genomic maintenance. Modifications of the ncRNA network due to altered ncRNAs can cause the cell to shift towards to neoplastic phenotype; this is cancer initiation. Mutations in the well-known cancer driver genes provide the incipient cancer cell with a selective growth advantage and fuel its consequent clonal expansion. Because of the crucial role of the altered ncRNAs in tumorigenesis, targeting them may be a reasonable therapeutic strategy.

Cancer is the greatest cause of mortality worldwide. Various drug classes treat various cancers. Nanoformulations made from natural sources are being studied for treating several diseases, including cancer. Surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation have mostly failed to treat cancer. These drugs may damage quickly dividing healthy tissues, structural anomalies, bodily toxicity, long-term side effects, tumor cell drug resistance, and psychiatric disturbances. Researchers are developing nanoscale medicines using natural medications like Malva sylvestris and Curcumin to lower concentrations and improve target specificity. Nanoparticles’ small size and unique properties make them beneficial. They encapsulate medicinal ingredients, improving solubility, medication release, cellular absorption, and delivery. Nanoparticles may better identify and bind to cancer cells when functionalized with ligands. Natural chemicals and nanotechnology may improve medication availability, distribution, and targeting to cancer cells, making cancer treatments more effective and safe. Nanomedicine, which employs nanoparticles to treat cancer and malignant cells, has grown rapidly because nanodrugs are more effective and have fewer side effects than current commercial cancer drugs. Nanotechnology-based natural chemicals and pharmaceutical delivery methods for cancer therapy are covered in this review article. The paper discusses nanoparticle pros and cons and natural chemicals’ cancer-fighting appeal.