Repeat expansion diseases (REDs) are genetic disorders caused by unusual expansions of DNA sequences within certain genes. They cause several neurodegenerative diseases including Huntington’s disease (HD), myotonic dystrophy (DM), spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), fragile X syndrome (FXS), and others. The pathogenic repeat expansions disrupt normal cellular processes by producing aberrant RNA repeat sequences, leading to toxic protein aggregation, RNA foci, and altered gene expression. Although they belong to the rare disease group, such diseases must be investigated to understand integral mechanisms and prevention. Current methods for alleviating these diseases involve—gene silencing therapies by antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and RNA interference (RNAi), CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, small molecule therapies, etc. ASOs and RNAi reduce toxic protein production genes while CRISPR/Cas9 excise or alter expanded repeats. Small molecule therapies targeting RNA repeat-binding or proteostasis regulation are being developed to alleviate toxic protein accumulation, prevent RNA toxic foci formation, and promote the degradation of misfolded proteins. Additionally, gene replacement and regulatory element modification restore normal gene function. Some researchers tried to modulate toxic protein aggregation using heat shock proteins and chemical chaperones. This is a comprehensive review on the available research on RED treatment and their ongoing challenges, such as efficient delivery of therapies to the central nervous system, minimizing off-target effects in gene editing, sustaining therapeutic efficacy, and addressing toxicity and scalability in large-scale applications.

This review focuses on the current advances in the field of therapeutic targets and treatments for stroke. Stroke is a major health problem worldwide, with significant impacts on morbidity and mortality, and a considerable burden on the medical and socio-economic systems. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on acute treatments and therapeutic targets. Current stroke treatments like recanalization therapies focus mainly on restoring blood flow to the brain, reducing cell death, and preventing further damage, but have limitations in terms of efficacy and long-term outcomes. Besides acute treatments (mobile stroke units, telerehabilitation) and acute therapeutic targets, the review focuses on longer-term therapeutic targets, such as neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. Neuroprotective strategies target the mechanisms underlying energy failure, cellular acidosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, excitotoxicity, calcium channels dysregulation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, apoptosis, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Neuroregenerative approaches include stem cell therapy, gene therapy, growth factors, and rehabilitation techniques that promote the rewiring of neuronal circuits in the brain. Non-pharmacological treatments like neurostimulation and bioengineering are also presented. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and future directions in translating these therapies into clinical practice. Overall, the treatment of ischemic stroke is a complex and multifaceted process that requires a combination of acute measures as well as longer-term strategies to promote brain repair and recovery. The treatment of ischemic stroke has made significant progress in recent years with the development of new treatments and ongoing research to improve outcomes for stroke patients. However, before these therapies can be successfully integrated into routine clinical practise, further research is needed to establish standardised protocols, overcome methodological limitations, and overcome clinical challenges. By further deepening our understanding of the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke and developing innovative treatments, we can improve outcomes and quality of life for stroke survivors.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) elicits a variety of effects on the regulation of oxidative stress, a topic that remains shrouded in controversy. This intricate regulation plays a pivotal role in the aging process and its associated diseases. Notably, it centers around the challenge posed by endogenous antioxidant defenses, which often struggle to counteract free radicals-induced damage to various neural cell macromolecules. The interplay between IGF-1 and oxidative stress holds significant implications. Both factors are intertwined in the context of degenerative and inflammatory disruptions within the central nervous system (CNS), giving rise to dysfunctions in neurons and glial cells. These dysfunctions encompass detrimental outcomes such as excitotoxicity, neuronal attrition, and axonal impairment, all of which are closely related to behavioral irregularities. However, the complexities of IGF-1’s impact remain a topic of debate. Divergent research findings present IGF-1 as both an antioxidative agent and a catalyst to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in various neuropathologies. This diversity of outcomes has contributed to the ongoing controversy in the field. The present theoretical review undertakes a comprehensive vision, shedding light on the role of IGF-1 as a regulator within the mechanistic framework of oxidative stress responses. This regulatory role serves as the basis for the emergence of progressive neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory conditions. Particularly compelling is the exploration of IGF-1 as a potential target for promising therapeutic interventions in this domain. However, the review also highlights significant limitations, including the considerations to work with this factor and the need for further research to clarify IGF-1’s role. Future perspectives should focus on refining our understanding of IGF-1’s mechanisms and exploring its therapeutic potential in more detail.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and incurable neurodegenerative disorder, with an unknown etiology and a multifactorial pathophysiology characterized by protein misfolding, neuroinflammation, and neuronal loss. There are three well-discussed main hypotheses for the pathophysiology of AD, which are related to i) the accumulation of amyloid β (Aβ) protein aggregates in the extracellular space, ii) deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau fragments as neurofibrillary tangles, and iii) dysregulation of hemostasis of some neurotransmitters involved in the disease, such as acetylcholine (ACh) and glutamate. The association of all these factors is responsible for installing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, which contribute to progressive neuronal death in specific brain regions. More recently, other remarkable pathological characteristics have been described, involving changes in all levels of cellular components, especially in the action and function of protein kinases. These enzymes are crucial for cellular regulation since they play a pivotal role in the phosphorylation of protein substrates by transferring a phosphate group from the ATP molecule to threonine, serine, or tyrosine residues. In more recent studies, some kinases have been especially reported by their role in inflammatory and oxidative processes associated to AD, such as cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 (CDK5), glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), and the microtubule affinity regulatory kinases (MARKs). Under homeostatic conditions, protein kinases act as cellular signals, directing physiological responses, but in AD pathogenesis, these enzymes have an exacerbated activity in the brain, justifying the need for a better comprehension of their function and role, and how new kinase inhibitors could lead to innovative drugs. In this context, this brief review aimed to compile the literature data related to the most recent efforts and strategies in Medicinal Chemistry in the discovery of new kinase inhibitors, opening new ways to AD therapeutics.